Editorial Policy
Last updated: May 14, 2026
WebPMagic is an independent project, and the guides here are meant to give developers clear, accurate information on image optimization and web performance. This page explains how that content is produced and what you can expect from it.
1. How Our Articles Are Produced
Our guides are drafted with the assistance of AI writing tools and then reviewed and edited for accuracy before publishing. We don't publish scraped or plagiarized content, and we check the technical claims — compression ratios, browser support, API behavior — against authoritative sources such as Google's web.dev, MDN Web Docs, and the official format specifications. Where a figure comes from a specific source, we say so.
2. Checking Recommendations
Web performance changes quickly. When we recommend a tool, script, or technique, we aim to keep it aligned with current official documentation from web.dev, MDN, and W3C standards rather than outdated advice.
3. No Pay-to-Play Endorsements
We don't accept payment in exchange for positive reviews or biased tool recommendations. If sponsored content or affiliate links are ever added, they'll be clearly disclosed at the top of the article in question.
4. Corrections and Updates
Errors happen, and browser behavior or best practices can change. When a factual error is identified or a code sample becomes outdated, we update the article and note the change. The "Last updated" date at the top of each guide reflects the most recent revision.
5. Feedback Is Welcome
If you spot a bug in a code sample, an outdated recommendation, or anything that's simply wrong, please tell us via the contact page. Corrections from readers are genuinely useful and we act on them.
Have a question about this policy?
Email us directly at support@webpmagic.com or use the contact form.